CR and famine
The main reason why CR is thought to be effective at
extending life is associated with the fact that it
represents an adaptition to deal with famine conditions.
Famines are part of the natural state
Malthus suggested that all organisms could be expected to
have a tendency to expand their numbers faster than resources
can be reasonably expected to increase.
The fact that population growth tends to be exponential -
while it is not very realistic to think that resources can
behave in the same way - naturally results in taking
organisms to the edge of starvation.
On these grounds it seems reasonable to suggest that
abundant food resources would have rarely been available in the
past.
If they had regularly been available, predators
would most likely have reproduced until the sheer numbers of
their offspring depleted the available resources.
A number of people don't seem to accept this point.
They argue that the ability to leave a famine environment
will restore an abundant food supply - apparently ignoring
the fact that organisms are pressed into competition with
their cousins all over the entire planet - e.g.:
Dietary restriction would probably not increase longevity in
human beings and other species able to leave unsuitable
environments.
- PMID 16628488
Seasonal famines
In addition to the fact that general resource shortages can
be expected to be common, the existence of the seasons
suggests another possible source of resource shortages -
winter often prevents fruiting, kills the bodies of many
plants and reduces growth rates of others.
De Grey's speculations
While seasonal food shortages are only one type of
resource shortage, their existence has led Aubrey
de Grey to speculate that the extent of lifespan
extension in response to CR is not a function of
the lifespan of the organism.
In particular, he has argued:
The pattern of starvation that the weather imposes is
suggested here to be of a sort that will tend to cause all
terrestrial animals, even those as far apart
phylogenetically as nematodes and mice, to possess the
ability to live a similar maximum absolute (rather than
proportional) amount longer when food is short than when it
is plentiful.
- PMID 15711074
To investigate this possibility, I constructed a model which
simulated what I regard as some rather pessimistic
possibilities for CR-induced life extension.
In particular I assumed that CR did not "retard aging" - and
merely resulted in a transient, reversible reduction of
mortality during the famine period.
I then simulated a lifespan with a series of seasonal CR
episodes - on simulated organisms with different aging rates
- to examine the effect of the length of their lifespans on
the degree of life extension produced.
The results are as illustrated in the following graph:
This is a "survival curve" graph - a plot of % of organisms
surviving against time.
Organisms with different natural rates of aging are
represented by different colours.
The lines on the left represents the survival curve of well-fed
controls, while the ones on the right shows the survival curve
of organisms subjected to periodic resource shortages.
The simulation models mortality as increasing with age
according to a Gompertzian function - and it transiently
reduces mortality by a constant proportion during the
famines.
From this graph it can be seen that the median lifespan
(i.e. the time when 50% of the population is dead) increases
with the lifespan of the organisms - so that the life
extension is a function of the lifespan of the organism.
I consider the assumptions made by this model pretty
pessimisitic ones. If CR does result in
actually retarding aging (rather than transiently
reducing mortality while the organism is on CR) the results
would even more strongly indicate that CR's effect on life
expectancy were a function of lifespan.
Atrophy of the CR response due to reduced selection?
Unfortunately, this model does not deal with the
possibilty that the effects of CR on mortality are reduced
in long-lived creatures.
I consider that it is reasonable to suggest that
small organisms with fewer resource reserves are more likely
to die as a result of seasonal famines than large creatures
with sufficient fat reserves to last through the winter (and
thus are more likely to have powerful conservation responses
activated by CR).
Unfortunately, it does not appear to be very realistic to
expect to be able to estimate to what extent the CR response
has atrophied due to disuse on theoretical grounds alone.
No doubt fewer humans than mice starve during a typical
winter - but quanitifying the result of such an effect on
lifespan presents some significant challenges - and I doubt
whether it can realistically be done from one's armchair.
Certainly, empirically, humans do still have a fairly
significant response to CR - at least in terms of its
short-term effects on their metabolism.
Rare resource shortages?
What other model could possibly lead to the
suggestion that the extent of life extension due to CR is
independent of the lifespan of the organism in question?
That would be a prediction of a model which treats
resource shortages as a rare event - only occurring very
rarely - so the chance of two resource shortages happening
in any organism's lifespan are low.
However, to me that seems unbelievably unrealistic.
Much more likely is seasonal resource shortages
occurring every single year.
The idea that resource shortages are rare events is in
conflict with the notion that reproduction takes ecosystems
to the edge of starvation. Food shortages would have been
common in the past - not rare.
Other possible reasons for reduced life extension in long-lived organisms
Aside from the evolutionary arguments given above, there
are other reasons for thinking that long-lived
organisms might get relatively less out of CR than
short-lived organisms.
For example, if long-lived organisms are the result of selecting
for long lifespans, then it may be that the same systems CR uses
to extend lifespan are already being activated naturally - and
in that case the additional life extension due to CR might be
reduced.
Life extension theory
However, it doesn't seem very reasonable to suggest that the
extent of life extension due to CR is likely to be independent
of lifespan on theoretical grounds.
Nor should CR be regarded as merely a response to seasonal
food shortages - since food shortages can occur over longer
time periods than a year - and are likely to have done so
historically.
Essentially, the question of how organisms with different
lifespans respond to CR is an empirical one - since it
depends on the extent to which adaptations which are rarely
activated atrophy - and theory alone offers few clues about
that in this instance.
|